Skip to main content

Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.

The US Navy has awarded a rocket propulsion start-up company a contract to develop and test solid-fuel rocket engines. This initiative is part of the Navy’s ongoing effort to enhance its Standard Missile program with cutting-edge technology.

Ursa Major, a Denver-based propulsion company, has been selected to undertake this significant task. The contract involves prototyping and testing a new design for the Navy’s Mk 104 rocket motor. This project falls under the Naval Energetics Systems and Technologies program.

H09 E036 Usa 1070 Copper

Ursa Major aims to leverage its specialized Lynx production process for Solid Rocket Motors (SRMs) by employing additive manufacturing techniques. This innovative approach will focus on creating a high-performing motor that is not only reliable but also easier to manufacture compared to legacy models. The Mk 104 motor, crucial for the Navy’s Standard Missiles, is vital in providing diverse defense capabilities, including intercepting hypersonic weapons.

Ursa Major 2

Despite the significance of this contract, Ursa Major has not disclosed its exact value, though it is described as being in the “single-digit millions.”

Ursa Major revealed the Lynx manufacturing process last November. This process incorporates advanced tools like 3D printing, which significantly enhances the efficiency of building solid rocket motor cases and other system subcomponents. Solid rocket motors are currently in high demand, yet the number of suppliers remains limited. Ursa Major’s goal is to change the industry through its efficient and rapid production capabilities.

The company’s CEO said earlier this year, “If every prime and incumbent and new entrant were providing solid rocket motors today, we would not fill the gaps the US has. A lot of it is in part due to the inflexibility of manufacturing solid rocket motors. Building a Javelin is extremely different than building a [Precision Strike Missile], which is extremely different than building a [Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems]. Our mission is to make those much more similar and common on the manufacturing side.”

JOIN THE MOVEMENT

Keep up to date with our latest videos, news and content