Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.
House Democrats are threatening to withhold support for renewing the government’s warrantless surveillance powers unless FBI Director Kash Patel is removed from office.
Some shit you should know before you dig in: If you’re unaware, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was originally passed in 1978 in the aftermath of the Church Committee hearings that exposed widespread illegal surveillance of American citizens by the FBI and CIA under J. Edgar Hoover. The law created a secret federal court, the FISA Court, to oversee government requests for surveillance warrants on foreign powers and their agents operating inside the US. Section 702, the provision now up for renewal, was added in 2008 and is a different beast (it allows the government to collect communications of foreign nationals located outside the US without a warrant, targeting them through American internet and phone companies). The problem is that Americans who communicate with those foreign targets get swept up in the collection too, and intelligence agencies can then search through that data without obtaining a warrant. Supporters argue Section 702 is one of the most valuable tools in the US intelligence arsenal, responsible for stopping terrorist attacks and providing critical insight into foreign adversaries. Critics argue it amounts to a backdoor around the Fourth Amendment, allowing the government to warrantlessly surveil American citizens by simply targeting someone they communicate with abroad, and that the potential for abuse makes it too dangerous to reauthorize without significant reforms.
What’s going on now: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries warned Thursday that Patel’s continued presence as FBI director makes “bipartisan common ground on the FISA 702 question extremely difficult,” telling reporters there is “zero reason for us to trust Kash Patel” with expanded surveillance powers. The warning lands as Section 702 is set to expire on April 30 and negotiations to renew it are already a shit show to say the least.
Last week, 20 House conservatives blocked an attempt to ram through a clean 18-month extension in the middle of the night, forcing a scramble for a 10-day extension. House Republicans this week unveiled a new three-year extension proposal that adds some civil liberties guardrails but stops short of the full warrant requirement that hard-liners are demanding.
This all comes as Speaker Johnson is trying to thread an increasingly narrow needle (appeasing conservative holdouts seeking stronger privacy protections, managing a push from some members to attach a central bank digital currency ban to the bill, and now navigating Democratic demands tied to Patel) all before a deadline that is days away.
