Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.
Media Matters, a left-leaning media watchdog organization, has filed a federal lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission, alleging that a recent investigation into its activities constitutes illegal political retaliation.
Some shit you should know before you read: If you’re unaware, Media Matters for America is a left-leaning nonprofit organization founded in 2004 with its stated mission of “monitoring, analyzing, and correcting” what it perceives as “conservative misinformation” in the US media landscape. The group primarily targets right-leaning media outlets and personalities, often publishing detailed reports and analyses intended to expose bias, misinformation, or hate speech. Critics (mostly from conservative circles) accuse Media Matters of acting as a partisan attack group rather than a neutral watchdog, alleging that it selectively targets political opponents and seeks to influence advertisers to defund opposing voices. In late 2023, Media Matters drew national attention when it published a report showing that advertisements from major companies were being placed next to pro-Nazi and extremist content on X, which prompted Elon Musk and the platform to accuse the organization of manipulating data and orchestrating an advertiser boycott (a claim Media Matters denies).
What’s going on now: In a notable development, Media Matters officially filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), arguing that the agency’s investigation into the organization is a politically motivated act of retaliation for its reporting on Elon Musk and his social media platform, X. Filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, the lawsuit claims the FTC’s probe is part of a broader campaign orchestrated by allies of the Trump administration to punish Media Matters for exercising its First Amendment rights. The watchdog group says that the FTC’s inquiry (which demands extensive internal records, including communications with advertisers and other watchdog groups) is not grounded in legitimate regulatory concern but is instead intended to attack their work.
The lawsuit calls the inquiry “overbroad and designed to be maximally burdensome,” describing it as “a fishing expedition into the most sensitive areas” of Media Matters’ operations, including its editorial process, financials, and newsgathering activities.
This comes after the FTC launched its investigation shortly after the group published reports in 2023 showing that ads from major brands were appearing next to neo-Nazi and extremist content on X. The FTC’s probe centers around whether Media Matters illegally coordinated with advertisers to orchestrate a boycott of X, a claim the organization vehemently denies.
In a statement, Angelo Carusone, Chairman and President of Media Matters, said, “The Trump administration has demonstrated that it will not hesitate to abuse the powers of the federal government to undermine the First Amendment and stifle dissent. This highly politicized FTC investigation is part of that playbook. This is a significant free speech issue, and Media Matters will not back down from this fight. If the Trump administration is allowed to use this unlawful investigation to punish legitimate reporting on behalf of a political ally, then there is nothing to stop it from targeting anyone who stands up and exercises their rights.”
