Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.
Former Voice of America employees have sued Trump administration officials, alleging the network’s editorial independence was compromised by censorship in violation of federal law and the First Amendment.
Some shit you should know before you dig in: If you’re unaware, Voice of America is a US government-funded international broadcaster founded during World War II to deliver news to audiences abroad, including those living under authoritarian regimes. Since returning to office, President Trump has criticized the outlet over what he calls “anti-American propaganda” and argued it failed to represent US interests. In response, the administration moved to dramatically scale back its operations, cutting staffing levels, reducing language services, and attempting to reshape its content and oversight through leadership changes at its parent agency.
What’s going on now: In a notable development, a group of Voice of America journalists (Barry Newhouse, Ayesha Tanzeem, Dong Hyuk Lee, and Ksenia Turkova), alongside press freedom organizations PEN America and Reporters Without Borders, have filed a lawsuit in federal court against Kari Lake, acting US Agency for Global Media CEO Michael Rigas, and the agency itself. The plaintiffs argue that political appointees improperly interfered with newsroom decisions, violating both the First Amendment and a legal “firewall” designed to protect VOA’s editorial independence from government control.
The lawsuit alleges that VOA leadership censored coverage, suppressed stories unfavorable to the Trump administration, and inserted partisan messaging into broadcasts while presenting it as objective news. Among the examples cited are restrictions on reporting about anti-regime protests in Iran, the removal or downplaying of civilian casualty reports, and the publication of content that closely mirrors White House talking points. The complaint also points to specific instances of managers directing coverage, banning certain topics or guests, and pressuring journalists to demonstrate loyalty to the administration.
The plaintiffs went on to argue that these actions have fundamentally altered VOA’s mission, transforming it from an independent news organization into what they describe as a “propaganda mouthpiece.” Through the lawsuit, the plaintiffs are seeking a permanent injunction to restore and protect VOA’s editorial independence, along with nominal damages and coverage of legal fees. They are also asking the court to bar further political interference in newsroom operations and to reaffirm the legal protections governing the outlet.
In response, the US Agency for Global Media has defended its role, stating that VOA must reflect US policy and serve the interests of the American public, though officials have not directly addressed the specific allegations of censorship and propaganda outlined in the complaint.
