Skip to main content

Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.

A bipartisan group of influential US lawmakers is demanding answers and launching investigations into claims that the US military carried out a second unlawful strike to kill survivors of a suspected drug-smuggling vessel.

Some shit you should know before you dig in: Recently, The Washington Post reported that Secretary Hegseth issued a directive tokill everybodyaboard a suspected drug-smuggling vessel off the coast of Trinidad on September 2. According to the report, the initial missile strike killed nine of the eleven people on board, leaving two survivors on parts of the wreckage. The Post, citing multiple sources with direct knowledge of the operation, claims that Adm. Frank M.MitchBradley ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s directive, killing the remaining survivors in the water. Internal reports and briefings later described the second strike as adouble tapintended to destroy the vessel as a navigational hazard, but the Post’s sources allege the true intent was to eliminate all survivors.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth visits Joint Task Force North, U.S. Northern Command, to see the efforts military men and women are undertaking in support of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to secure the southern border at Fort Bliss, Texas, Feb. 12, 2025. U.S. Northern Command is working together with the Department of Homeland Security to augment U.S. Customs and Border Protection along the southern border with additional military forces. This initial deployment of 1,600 active-duty personnel brings the total military Title 10 forces along the border to nearly 4,000 personnel. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Andrew R. Sveen)

As of now, the Pentagon and Secretary Hegseth have denied the claims, labeling the reporting as false, inflammatory, and based on anonymous sources. Hegseth took to X to call the allegations “fake news,” claiming that all operations were lawful and carried out under the oversight of top military and civilian legal advisors. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell echoed that sentiment, calling the narrative “completely false” and criticizing The Post’s reporting as a politically motivated attack on US service members.

What’s going on now: In a notable development, senior lawmakers from both parties are publicly expressing alarm and vowing to launch robust oversight efforts. Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH), the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee and a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, said that if the reported second strike occurred,that would be very serious, and I agree that that would be an illegal act.”

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, echoed Turner’s concerns and pledged a public and transparent investigation. Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, Kelly said, “We’re going to have an investigation. We’re going to have a public hearing. We’re going to put these folks under oath. And we’re going to find out what happened. And then, there needs to be accountability.”

This wave of congressional pressure follows an announcement from Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, who confirmed that the committee has “directed inquiries to the Department” and will be conducting “vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances.”

More to come.

JOIN THE MOVEMENT

Keep up to date with our latest videos, news and content