Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.

A federal judge in Massachusetts has upheld the state’s assault weapons ban, asserting that it aligns with the “historical tradition” of gun control.

District Judge Dennis Saylor referenced the longstanding regulation of “dangerous and unusual” weapons, noting, “The relevant history affirms the principle that in 1791, as now, there was a tradition of regulating ‘dangerous and unusual’ weapons – specifically, those that are not reasonably necessary for self-defense.”

In his ruling, Judge Saylor elaborated that the assault weapons and large-capacity magazines targeted by the 1998 Massachusetts law are “not suitable for ordinary self-defense purposes, and pose substantial dangers far beyond those inherent in the design of ordinary firearms.” This law mirrors the expired federal ban from 2004. The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), which sought a preliminary injunction against the law’s enforcement, has indicated plans to appeal the decision.

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell praised the ruling, stating, “Gun safety laws work, and they can be enforced consistent with public safety and the Second Amendment. This decision to uphold the state’s assault weapons ban is a significant win that will protect the public and continue Massachusetts’ leadership on gun violence prevention.”